What is metagaming in RP + 6 examples

ko-fi Written by Andruid
LED keyboard with the text: What is metagaming?

What is metagaming in RP, and how do you know if it's bad? I break it down for you in this post with several examples.

Table of Contents

    Have you ever heard someone accuse another player of metagaming? Perhaps you’ve seen the term but weren’t sure what it meant.

    In this post, I define the term metagaming (sometimes written as “meta gaming” or “meta-gaming”) and provide several examples of metagaming in roleplay.

    I also offer some advice for avoiding or reducing harmful occurrences in your favorite RP game.

    What is metagaming in RP?

    Metagaming (meta gaming or meta-gaming) refers to the in-character use of any knowledge that you, the player, have that your character would have no reasonable way of knowing.

    In the context of roleplaying games, the term is most often applied to situations where a player’s real-life knowledge of the game affects their character’s behavior, usually in a way that disregards the character’s established personality, history, or abilities.

    Because this is seen as “breaking character” or behaving out of character (OOC), it’s often frowned upon by serious roleplayers.

    Metagaming can happen in any multiplayer game where there is roleplay, including Grand Theft Auto (GTA), Project Zomboid, Dungeons and Dragons (D&D), and multi-user dungeons (MUDs).

    What are some examples of metagaming?

    Some examples of metagaming in RP include:

    • Pursuing secrets in character based on your (the player’s) knowledge of their existence
    • Going to an in-game location based on your (the player’s) knowledge of who will be there
    • Being nice or rude to another player character (PC) based on your (the player’s) knowledge or feelings rather than your character’s
    • Using your (the player’s) knowledge of how the game works to create a character optimized to win
    • Changing your character’s behavior based on your (the player’s) knowledge of a situation
    • Making assumptions about what happened in character based on your (the player’s) knowledge of who was playing at the time
    • Sharing in-character information or secrets through out-of-character means, such as via Discord
    • Stealing from a character when you know the player is AFK, linkdead, or otherwise unable to prevent it in-character

    Metagaming isn’t a concern in all types of games or in all situations. Keep reading to learn more about when it’s considered harmful versus an accepted practice.

    Metagamer playing a video game.
    Metagaming can happen in video games such as Grand Theft Auto (GTA) and Project Zomboid, too! When you make a decision for your character, think about whether it’s something that really makes sense for that character’s role and personality.

    Is all metagaming bad?

    No. Not all metagaming is necessarily bad. Whether and to what extent it’s considered harmful depends on the game’s roleplay culture and the expectations of the community.

    The term itself is usually reserved for behavior that is seen as cheating, undesirable, unsporting, or undermining the spirit of the game.

    However, some activities that might technically fall under the definition of metagaming are actually considered helpful or necessary in many contexts.

    For example, consider a gruff, unsociable character going out of their way to help a newcomer in town. The behavior (helping a newbie) might be OOCly motivated and require breaking character, but many players would consider it good for the game or community.

    Examples of metagaming in roleplay

    Below are specific examples to help readers better understand the concept and its limitations:

    1. Pursuing secrets in-character based on your (the player’s) knowledge of their existence

    EXAMPLE: You, the player, are aware that there’s a hidden treasure in a secret location. You know about the treasure because another player told you about it. Or, because you found out about it on a previous character. You take your current character to the location to search for it, even though they have no in-game knowledge of the treasure or its location.

    While definitely an example of metagaming, this behavior is considered perfectly acceptable in some games and is deeply frowned upon in others.

    Consulting the game’s policies and/or community will usually tell you whether or not it’s okay. For example:

    3rd Party Communication When In-Game. RP should be kept in game. RP in voice chat is not valid.
    Rules for Day’s End, a Project Zomboid server. Note how the sharing of IC information outside of RP is considered metagaming on this server.

    Generally speaking, serious roleplaying games take offense to this kind of metagaming, whereas hack-n-slash and casual adventure games do not.

    If metagaming is allowed to occur because of a bug, typo, or info that shouldn’t be available to players, the term “twinking” applies.

    (Tip: If you’re an admin, consider rewarding players for reporting game typos and bugs. This encourages the community to help plug holes that make your game vulnerable to twinking.)

    2. Going to an in-game location based on your (the player’s) knowledge of who will be there

    EXAMPLE: You, the player, are aware that a coffee shop in the game is a popular hangout. You’re also aware that several of your favorite players are currently roleplaying a scene there. You decide to take your character to that location even though your character hates coffee.

    Again, many games consider this perfectly acceptable. Usually, players resolve the disconnect by making up a narrative as to why their character would be in a place they normally wouldn’t visit.

    For example, they hate coffee but were craving chai tea.

    Games that are okay with this type of behavior often provide players with OOC info about characters’ whereabouts.

    These games assume that players will act on the OOC knowledge ICly; thus, it’s not considered metagaming so much as a tool to help players find each other so that they can roleplay.

    3. Making assumptions based on your (the player’s) knowledge of who is playing the game with you

    EXAMPLE 1: You, the player, are aware that only one other PC in the game is capable of doing X. When X happens, your character assumes their guilt and accuses that character, even though there are NPCs who also had the means or motivation to do X.

    EXAMPLE 2: You, the player, are aware that a particular character was online at the time Y happened. Your character immediately assumes the other character’s guilt and interrogates them. Your character tries to get them to admit that they’re responsible for Y, even though there are other PCs or NPCs that may have had reason to do it.

    Also known as “smallworlding,” the above examples are considered bad form in games with a heavy focus on immersive storytelling.

    Smallworlding occurs when your character ignores the presence of non-player characters – the multitude of other denizens who populate the game world.

    In some games, the rules explicitly forbid smallworlding in order to protect antagonistic characters and villains. These games usually attempt to maintain a balance between antagonistic and other types of interactions, e.g. social and cooperative RP.

    Again, consult the game’s policies and/or community if you want to know how others will view the above behavior.

    4. Using your (the player’s) knowledge of how the game works to create a character optimized to win

    EXAMPLE: You, the player, are aware that a character with X stat/skills will be more likely to succeed at doing Y. You decide to give your character those qualities, even though there’s nothing in your PC’s backstory to explain why they would have them.

    Also known as “min-maxing,” this behavior is likewise frowned upon in games with a heavy focus on immersive storytelling.

    In games that prioritize RP, players believe strongly that a character’s background should come first; any stats and skills should be a reflection of that background.

    Prioritizing skills/stats is usually seen as a desire to “win” the game, and in story-focused games, the goal is not to win but to tell a compelling story. Compelling stories require both losers and characters with flaws.

    Even so, min-maxing isn’t a concern among all roleplay communities. In some games, creating a highly specialized character is considered a fun and acceptable challenge.

    5. Changing your character’s behavior based on your (the player’s) knowledge

    EXAMPLE: You, the player, are aware that a certain character is played by someone with a lot of influence (such as an admin or GM). Your character goes out of their way to become friends or allies with them, even though they normally wouldn’t.

    Alternatively, your character goes out of their way to avoid conflict with them because you don’t want to be at a disadvantage against someone who probably knows the game better than you do or could retaliate using their influence as a GM.

    Many games view these examples as unhealthy metagaming. Similar to min-maxing, they involve breaking character in order to gain an advantage or avoid a disadvantage.

    Depending on the game, it’s not uncommon for players to consciously or unconsciously avoid conflict with influential players. Again, the degree to which these behaviors are considered harmful varies by game and community.

    RP-heavy games will often try to keep staff alts a secret in order to prevent this type of metagaming.

    However, doing so can lead to a lot of speculation, rumoring, and risk aversion among players – especially if they’ve dealt with abusive staff in toxic games before.

    6. Using Discord to collude with another player

    EXAMPLE 1: Your character is cornered and being bullied by a more powerful character. Your character has no way of calling for help, so you tab into Discord and tell your friend to log in and come help you. Your friend’s character, who was “just passing by,” comes and helps get your character to safety.

    EXAMPLE 2: You want to put someone in their place, but your character isn’t powerful enough to do it alone. You contact your friend over Discord and come up with a plan to attack together at a time when you know the victim will be at a disadvantage.

    In the first example, the friend’s character has no way of knowing that their buddy is in trouble. The character is acting on OOC knowledge that they (the player) learned over Discord.

    Although this example is somewhat understandable (no one likes feeling powerless in the face of a bully), it’s still considered bad form in serious roleplaying games. In such games, it’s often against the rules to use OOC communication to deal with IC situations.

    The second example shows how the same method (using OOC communication) can be used by an antagonist to plan out or execute an attack.

    In both examples, the players using Discord are engaging in something known as “OOC collusion.” They’re colluding with each other outside the game in order to deal with in-character situations.

    For more examples, check out this Wikipedia article on metagaming in roleplay.

    How can you tell when someone is metagaming?

    Sherlock Holmes-like figure with a magnifying glass and top hat.
    Is it metagaming? How do you know?

    Players make many decisions on behalf of their characters, so how do you know when they’ve crossed the line into metagaming territory?

    This is a tough question to answer, because it’s not always easy to identify when someone is using outside knowledge in character.

    In many cases, metagaming happens unconsciously and without intent to do harm. A player might allow their OOC knowledge to affect their IC activities without realizing it. Perhaps they do so in the course of trying to be helpful or to avoid a stressful situation.

    It’s also a tough question because games and communities differ on what they think of as metagaming.

    The bottom line?

    Metagaming typically only becomes a problem when it gives one person an unfair advantage over others.

    If everyone at the table engages openly in a behavior, and the rules don’t prevent it, that behavior becomes the norm and likely isn’t seen as unfair play.

    Consult the game’s policies. If the rules don’t explicitly draw the line between what’s acceptable and what’s not, ask the admins and game masters to add examples to help clarify.

    How can you prevent or avoid harmful metagaming?

    So you think your game might have a problem, what do you do? Here are some suggestions, though your mileage may vary depending on context:

    Tips for admins / GMs

    Tips specifically for game staff:

    • Define metagaming in your game’s policies and helpfiles. Outline what you consider to be harmful or unacceptable behavior and provide clear examples.
    • Suggest to players how they can respond to suspected metagaming or report evidence of metagaming. Keep in mind that metagaming can be difficult to prove.
    • Be explicit about the punishment for metagaming.
    • If it’s an RP game, clearly define what can/should be considered common IC knowledge versus not. For example, if the contents of a helpfile or page would not be widely known, make sure players know that so they can roleplay accordingly.
    • Avoid sharing limited IC knowledge in a meta way, e.g. by telling the players but not the characters. (For an example of how this sometimes happens, see my post on How to write excellent room descriptions.)
    • Consider limiting systems that are susceptible to metagaming or that result in a lot of metagaming accusations.

    To explain what I mean by the last bullet point, let me share an example from an experience I had while playing a multi-user dungeon (MUD) game:

    Example of limiting a system to reduce metagaming in RP

    In a sci-fi game I played, there was a public in-character communications channel that spanned an entire city populated by millions of people (NPCs).

    Characters would frequently call each other out over the comms channel, and players would get upset that their own characters’ voices would be so easily recognized.

    And they had a point: in a city of millions of chatty people, how realistic is it to pin someone down solely by the sound of their voice? Over a channel frequently interrupted by static?

    When IC tensions were high, the game’s admin would be bombarded by metagaming and smallworlding complaints, and it was burning them out.

    To address the issue, the admin re-coded the comms system so that voices became associated with IC handles similar to how you have a username in Discord that lights up when you talk.

    The channel was also redefined so that it only represented the people actively using it – not millions of “background” NPCs too.

    These changes made the system less susceptible to metagaming but, just as importantly, they changed players’ perceptions about it happening.

    The phrase Perception is reality written on a paper napkin.
    Sometimes players’ perceptions about metagaming can be just as toxic as actual occurrences. It’s important for games to address both.

    The moral of the story?

    Perceptions of metagaming can be just as harmful as actual instances of metagaming, because it breeds distrust and toxicity between players.

    Accusations also eat up admins’ time – time they freely volunteer, and no one wants to make a hobby of untangling player complaints.

    Sometimes, for the sake of one’s sanity, it may be better to limit a system, even if doing so requires a suspension of disbelief.

    Tips for players

    Finally, a few tips specifically for players:

    • If your game doesn’t clearly define metagaming in its policies, ask the staff to add a definition and examples (e.g. as part of the game’s help system).
    • Report players when you have strong evidence of rule-breaking, but avoid jumping to conclusions or making unfounded accusations. Speculation is a slippery slope.
    • Be aware of your own roleplay and how you’re using information. This is especially true for games that allow multiplaying (playing more than one character at a time). It’s very easy to forget that your character Jane learned something but that your character Joe didn’t.
    • Take notes when your character learns something important that could put someone else at a disadvantage. How did they find out? Note-taking is also useful for keeping facts straight across alts.

    Thanks for reading! If you found this post useful and informative, I recommend checking out my post on toxic gaming communities next.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Are there different types of metagaming?

    Yes, metagaming can manifest in various ways. For example, in strategic metagaming, players use out-of-game knowledge to plan out character actions and gain an upper hand.

    In narrative metagaming, players influence the course of the story with out-of-character knowledge.

    Each type can disrupt the natural flow of the game and affect other players’ experiences.

    How can I avoid metagaming in my roleplay sessions?

    Avoiding metagaming involves a level of self-awareness and respect for the game’s integrity.

    Some tips include: 1) stay in character and make decisions based on what your character would know/do, 2) remember that your knowledge is not your character’s knowledge, and 3) consult the game master when in doubt.

    How do I address metagaming if I notice it in my game?

    If you notice metagaming, the best approach is often to address it openly but diplomatically. You can discuss your concerns with the player in question, refer them to the rules, or involve a game master.

    Did you get value from this post? If so, please consider supporting the site by linking back to it or sharing it with your friends:

    Linking to the site is important for helping it get noticed, both within and outside the text-based gaming community. Your support means a lot!

    Smiling blonde woman wearing glasses.
    About the author

    Andruid is a writer, roleplayer, storyteller, and nerd who tries to live by Bill and Ted wisdom, i.e. “Be excellent to each other.”